by

Czech/Romani NGO tells Public Defender of Rights his remarks on Human Rights Day are a disgrace

-ngo-34 views


A protest in opposition to the investiture of Stanislav Křeček as ombudsman in Brno, Czech Republic, 20 February 2020. The identify Křeček means “hamster”, and the protester’s signal reads “A white Křeček/hamster goes via the darkness”, a reference to the up to date tune “White Rider” by a controversial neo-Nazi band. (PHOTO: Petr Zewlakk Vrabec)

The organizace Vzájemné soužití (Life Together), led by Kumar Vishwanathan, has printed an open letter to the Czech Public Defender of Rights (the ombudsman), Stanislav Křeček, not directly calling for his resignation. The letter, which Romea.cz is publishing in full translation under, is a response to remarks the ombudsman posted to social media on Human Rights Day.    

“The rhetoric you espouse provides us the impression of the advanced of being a well-to-do, white, heterosexual man of a decent age who lives inside a lair of certainties created by the bulk society and who doesn’t present the slightest generosity of spirit relating to wanting past the borders of that lair on the folks whom you’ll by no means contemplate a part of ‘us’…” the letter reads, stating elsewhere that “We imagine you’re going to get the assist you search on Fb and different social media platforms, however human rights are usually not primarily based on Fb ‘likes’, human rights are a given. If the honorable gentleman doesn’t comprehend these issues then he mustn’t stay in an workplace that’s primarily based on understanding that reality.”  

Open Letter from Life Collectively responding to the Czech Public Defender of Rights

Pricey Mr Ombudsman,

We’re writing to you in affiliation with Human Rights Day, an event you’ve gotten used to publish a press release to your Fb profile. The rhetoric you espouse provides us the impression of the advanced of being a well-to-do, white, heterosexual man of a decent age who lives inside a lair of certainties created by the bulk society and who doesn’t present the slightest generosity of spirit relating to wanting past the borders of that lair on the folks whom you’ll by no means contemplate a part of “us” – for instance, whenever you write that “Then again, maybe even within the identify of those self same rights, that very same European Union presently just isn’t stopping the creation or the rising exercise of a society of those that don’t acknowledge our idea of human rights, who don’t respect them, and who clearly declare their thought of a distinct ordering for all of European society,” and lots of different statements that outline some ambiguous “us” in opposition to all the remainder who’re totally different.     

We imagine you’re going to get the assist you search on Fb and different social media platforms, however human rights are usually not primarily based on Fb ‘likes’, human rights are a given. If the honorable gentleman doesn’t comprehend these issues then he mustn’t stay in an workplace that’s primarily based on understanding that reality.    

This isn’t the primary time you’ve gotten spoken about Romani folks with out them. [Note: A large part of the ombudsman’s post, not reproduced here, discusses the “issue of the Roma”, makes several inaccurate statements and reminisces about how his previous remarks about Roma have been, in his view, misunderstood.

Romani individuals are ready to satisfy with you, however folks like you don’t give them the chance to take action. We might have an interest to know what number of instances you’ve gotten really met Romani folks and what the context was, given the truth that you point out them in nearly each put up or tweet. 

In that regard we have been additionally fairly taken together with your comment about entrepreneurs throughout an interview you gave to Rádio Svobodné univerzum [Radio Free Universe] in September. At one level you stated the next: “Among the many entrepreneurs who are not looking for a Rom [as an employee] as a result of he’ll present up on Monday however not on Wednesday, that is what their expertise has been.” 

Later in that interview, you returned to that very same instance as soon as once more, this time immediately quoting these “entrepreneurs”, whom you didn’t additional establish:  “The entrepreneurs say: ‘I will not make use of you since you’re a Rom and I do know by the point Wednesday rolls round, Romani folks will not make to to work’.” By making these remarks (and others) you’ve gotten deeply offended our Romani staff and buddies (and never simply them) and we’re of the opinion that this type of rhetoric is disgraceful coming from the ombudsman. 

We do totally agree with the assertion you made at first of your debate about using Romani folks, specifically, that each one residents are equal by way of their rights and tasks. We remorse that in your function because the Public Defender of Rights you might be resorting to those sorts of generalizations, and we’re of the opinion that such rhetoric is unsuitable given the put up you maintain.   

Sincerely,

Kumar Vishwanathan

Renata Gažiová

Magdaléna Michlová





Source link

Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News Feed